Historia Eclesiastica-Eusebio de Cesareia [Eusebio de Cesareia, CPAD] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Os primeiros quatro séculos da. Buy Historia Eclesiástica (Em Portuguese do Brasil) by Eusebio de Cesareia ( ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free . 29 ago. História Eclesiástica – Ebook written by Eusébio de Cesareia. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices.
|Published (Last):||11 February 2018|
|PDF File Size:||4.1 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.31 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A really insightful and inspiring look into the life of the church – its teachings, practices, leadership, struggles, sufferings, and triumphs – during its first three centuries. Who so armed his soldiers with the weapons of true religion that their souls proved tougher than steel in their battles with their opponents? Quotes 4 8 Sep 24, Most of the chapter is like that. His soaring praise of Constantine is forgivable.
Картинки: Eusébio de cesareia
I enjoyed reading it and learned so much from Eusebius. This quotation, which is part of the introduction of the book, is followed by a prolonged quotation listing the deeds of various martyrs. And when things go well for Christians, he attributes it to God’s providence. Origen, Dionysius and Constantine were the top three.
It is a very interesting chronicle of early Christians. It took me quite a while to read this book it very detailed and quite dense.
Be the first to ask a question about The History of the Church. Forgiv Maier’s translation is a lot more fluid than others. He spends a little more time discussing Marcion, which is a fascinating topic, but the treatment is still ultimately brief. History can be dry, but it can also teach us invaluable lessons, encourage us on the correct beliefs and actions, warn us of the wrong directions, and demonstrate the outcomes of some of our misguided actions.
História Eclesiástica Eusébio De Cesaréia
Overall a wonderful addition to any library, and should be required reading for any who wish to opine on the “early church”. Book Seven – I took no notes on this chapter while I was reading. A good deal of the chapter is given ehsebio to discussing the life of Polycarp, who proved very hard to kill.
Churches and bishops were all more or less viewed as equals. To ask other readers questions about The History ceeareia the Churchplease sign up.
Eusébio de cesareia — Поиск по картинкам — [RED]
Want to Read Re Reading Read. He then goes on to discuss the historicity of various books including some apocryphal and lost works which I hadn’t previously heard ofconcluding that some are legitimate texts and some are not: Eusebius writes about the beginnings of the Church in a very thorough way, though dee thoughts jump occasionally, making him repetitive, specially when talking about heresies.
As I read, I took some notes which I’ve included below. Calling in prayer on God in heaven and on His Word, Jesus Christ Himself, the Saviour of all, to come to his aid, he advanced at the head of all his forces, intent on recovering for the Romans the liberty of their ancestors. Preview — The History of the Fe by Eusebius. Perhaps the battle between Good and Evil has not changed so very much after all Another interesting point en note is Eusebius’s acceptance that the author Luke-Acts is the same individual as Luke of Colossians 4: No trivia or quizzes yet.
But against the heresies, the Church was relatively quick to organize against them, root them out and expel the heretics.
Besides that, that, there’s nowhere else to turn for this kind of information. Want to Read saving…. Sometimes the commentary provides some evaluation of Eusebius’s history and the state of scholarly discussion. In the previous book, it was established that he was persecuting Christians in Rome, and pretending to the position of ruler. Christian authors in the first three centuries 8 9 Sep 18, Much of the text is given over to accounts of the suffering of the early Christians who were martyred at the hands of the Romans.
This is an important book because it is the only surviving historical record of the Church during its first years. I thought I had read some awful atrocities today, but there is nothing new under the sun.
The heroics of the early Christian martyrs will haunt you. I wish evangelicals would read literature such as this.
His intent was to trace the history of the Church from the time of Christ to the Great Persecution at the beginning of the fourth century and ending with the conversion of the Emperor Constantine. Christ in history and in the Old Testament 11 13 Sep 14, I was so grateful.
If you’re interested in the text, they might be worth a look – and if you’re planning to read it in the future, they point you in the direction of some of the more interesting things to look out for. Although I have to admit that I have not read every word of this book, I have read major portions of the book. Eusebius of Caesarea c. This is to be found in the Gospel of the Hebrews. Ultimately however, this book consists mostly of accounts of martyrdom.
The quotations in Eusebius’s work are the largest passages still extant. In fact, many ancient documents have been preserved in whole or in part thanks to the citations by Eusebius of Caesarea.
Dois tratados plotinianos em Eusébio de Cesaréia
He quotes primary sources extensively. One of those was external, represented by the imperial attacks in the form of state-sanctioned persecution.
Just as it was important for later generations to understand martyrdom and persecution, it was important for them to understand the heresies, so that they could be recognized when they reared their heads again, as they have repeatedly throughout history.
It’s also notable that Eusebius, Christianity’s first historian and a devout Christian, calls into question the validity of the book of Revelation he does make clear that he is in no position to pass judgment on the book’s importance. Major source on the early Church naturally as Eusebius was active in the eastern Mediterranean there is much less information about what was happening in the western part of the Roman Empire and even less about what was happening beyond the boundaries of the Empire in Armenia and Georgia.